<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog Navigation Survey Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sineadcochrane.com/2008/10/28/blog-navigation-survey-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sineadcochrane.com/2008/10/28/blog-navigation-survey-results/</link>
	<description>A technology and psychology sandwich, with an order of life on the side.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sinéad</title>
		<link>http://www.sineadcochrane.com/2008/10/28/blog-navigation-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-61927</link>
		<dc:creator>Sinéad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sineadcochrane.com/?p=232#comment-61927</guid>
		<description>@Aidan Magazine style layouts are perfect for non linear style blogs that wish they were websites, whilst retaining the wonderful ease at which you can update/post.

@Sabrina and @Dave - I agree that there aren't universals, but there ARE universal differences. Thanks for the feedback :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Aidan Magazine style layouts are perfect for non linear style blogs that wish they were websites, whilst retaining the wonderful ease at which you can update/post.</p>
<p>@Sabrina and @Dave - I agree that there aren&#8217;t universals, but there ARE universal differences. Thanks for the feedback :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.sineadcochrane.com/2008/10/28/blog-navigation-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-61925</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sineadcochrane.com/?p=232#comment-61925</guid>
		<description>Hi Sinead,

An interesting post (and some nice graphs  ). 

I’d agree with what Sabrina said about universals – I think that generalising on something like that can be difficult. 

When answering your question on the design of blog content, I rated it higher than the other visual design questions. For me, this is more important because I read most blogs through an RSS reader. I find that properly designed (i.e. marked-up) content looks better (proper headings, lists, images, etc) in an RSS reader as it will render these in a consistent way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sinead,</p>
<p>An interesting post (and some nice graphs  ). </p>
<p>I’d agree with what Sabrina said about universals – I think that generalising on something like that can be difficult. </p>
<p>When answering your question on the design of blog content, I rated it higher than the other visual design questions. For me, this is more important because I read most blogs through an RSS reader. I find that properly designed (i.e. marked-up) content looks better (proper headings, lists, images, etc) in an RSS reader as it will render these in a consistent way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.sineadcochrane.com/2008/10/28/blog-navigation-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-61924</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sineadcochrane.com/?p=232#comment-61924</guid>
		<description>Interesting results alright- I have actually found that since I started using a feed reader (Google Reader) that I am no longer navigating most blogs.  One of the reasons is that I am blocked from so many in work (blogspot mostly) but I can see the majority of the content in the reader.  I have also found the search option very good in quickly finding old content- my own included!  

Thats not to say that I have ignored the heuristic approach to the blog and have tried to make it easy to navigate with relevant categories for posts, a search area and different link categories so they are easy to spot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting results alright- I have actually found that since I started using a feed reader (Google Reader) that I am no longer navigating most blogs.  One of the reasons is that I am blocked from so many in work (blogspot mostly) but I can see the majority of the content in the reader.  I have also found the search option very good in quickly finding old content- my own included!  </p>
<p>Thats not to say that I have ignored the heuristic approach to the blog and have tried to make it easy to navigate with relevant categories for posts, a search area and different link categories so they are easy to spot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aidan</title>
		<link>http://www.sineadcochrane.com/2008/10/28/blog-navigation-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-61923</link>
		<dc:creator>Aidan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sineadcochrane.com/?p=232#comment-61923</guid>
		<description>Very interesting results. There are a number of blogger aid blogs like the brilliant Bloggerbuster which address the need for a less linear, diary-like approach to blogging. There are a number of magazine style layouts which allow people to see older content and favourite content much more easily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting results. There are a number of blogger aid blogs like the brilliant Bloggerbuster which address the need for a less linear, diary-like approach to blogging. There are a number of magazine style layouts which allow people to see older content and favourite content much more easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sabrina Dent</title>
		<link>http://www.sineadcochrane.com/2008/10/28/blog-navigation-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-61918</link>
		<dc:creator>Sabrina Dent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 04:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sineadcochrane.com/?p=232#comment-61918</guid>
		<description>Interesting data.

I think there's a flaw in this survey though. It assumes that "blog navigation" (and "web page navigation" for that matter) are universals - ie, that all blogs have the same navigation, or that all web pages do. They do not. This is why massive amounts of time, money and data crunching go into UI design and user testing.

Some blogs are easy to navigate, and some are difficult. Even small decisions can make visitors more likely to deep drill a blog. Single column sidebars will give you a lower bounce rate, as will dropping all default nomenclature and making concious decisions about what you call things. 

"More about..." makes much more sense than "Categories," for example - Categories tells you what it is, sort of, but doesn't tell you what you can do with it.

But still, this is good and useful data and I'll use it, so thanks for that :)

PS: "Do as I say, not as I do." My blog is a very pretty trainwreck. I know this. I'm gearing up for a re-design, with many of these issues in mind. Ugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting data.</p>
<p>I think there&#8217;s a flaw in this survey though. It assumes that &#8220;blog navigation&#8221; (and &#8220;web page navigation&#8221; for that matter) are universals - ie, that all blogs have the same navigation, or that all web pages do. They do not. This is why massive amounts of time, money and data crunching go into UI design and user testing.</p>
<p>Some blogs are easy to navigate, and some are difficult. Even small decisions can make visitors more likely to deep drill a blog. Single column sidebars will give you a lower bounce rate, as will dropping all default nomenclature and making concious decisions about what you call things. </p>
<p>&#8220;More about&#8230;&#8221; makes much more sense than &#8220;Categories,&#8221; for example - Categories tells you what it is, sort of, but doesn&#8217;t tell you what you can do with it.</p>
<p>But still, this is good and useful data and I&#8217;ll use it, so thanks for that :)</p>
<p>PS: &#8220;Do as I say, not as I do.&#8221; My blog is a very pretty trainwreck. I know this. I&#8217;m gearing up for a re-design, with many of these issues in mind. Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
