sinéad's lifestream

Online consumerism has become a prevalent part of modern life. With greater choice of availability and 24 hour access to a global market, many are now switching to shopping on the the Internet rather than walking around high streets or shopping centers for their desired purchases. Recent studies indicate that 96% of Irish Internet users have made an online purchase. But what are the perceived risks that online consumers feel?

Hello my name is Lee Kelly and I’m currently studying for a Msc Cyberpsychology. As part of the course I am conducting a research project regarding attitudes towards online shopping. More specifically this study aims to examine levels of trust placed, when using online commercial sites. The study will also try to ascertain if levels of trust online differ between Digital Natives (people who grew up surrounded by information technology) and Digital Immigrants (people who learn to use information technology in adulthood). I’m looking for participants that would fall under both groups; so if you are over 18 and enjoy shopping online then I need to recruit you (sorry I’ve been watching Milk) to take part in my Online survey.

Once again participants will be given the opportunity to win €50 Amazon voucher on completion of the survey. Thank You in advance to everyone who agrees to take part in this study and also many thank to Sinéad Cochrane for her help in allowing me to guest post.

I’ve always felt like there weren’t enough hours in the day, more so in the last two years because I’ve managed to turn myself into a raging workaholic. Working 9 to 5, Monday to Friday, going to college on Saturdays and spending countless hours each evening writing a thesis will do that to you. My plan had always been to educate myself into a better paid, more stimulating job. Now that I’m coming to the end of my Masters and with the recession wreaking havoc with the country I’m confident that this plan won’t work out. I won’t be becoming a passionate career person any time soon.

I’m being a realist.

This isn’t pessimism. I’m trying to be realistic, and I’ve taken something extremely positive from this realisation. I might not have more money in my pocket, but I’ll have so much more time. Time to re-read the books on my shelf. To be creative, to write, to take 100′s more photos. To lie on my bed listening to music for hours. To spend evenings with my friends and not worry about missing out on a night of college work. To chase a whim and embrace an opportunity. To volunteer my time to a cause that needs bodies and minds. To learn new skills, and teach my own.

I don’t need money to do these things, I just need time. Soon I’ll have a lot more of that, and I’m grateful for the consolation prize.

I’m tired of reading and hearing so many criticisms about the Bodies exhibition from anyone with a loud enough mouth to get heard. No, it’s not art. It is Science wrapped in a publicly accessible package, that in order to survive is required to market itself. Yes, it is entertainment. This is necessary in order to engage with people that have never had an interest in Biology, or any kind of Science before. It succeeds where the Science museums fail because it engages your curiosity, appeals to your intellect and forces you to have emotional reactions.

The use of real bodies is paramount to contextualising what you are seeing. For example, the initial displays, in the first room of the exhibition are just fragments of bone and flesh, parts of bodies in glass display cases. More like a “real” museum than anywhere else. One of the largest of these  displays is a pair of legs, with the muscles prominent and labelled  – but without the context of the full body the display just ends up looking like meat, like a large ham at Christmas time.

Adding even more context is the fact that they are posed, which is something that has been heavily criticised, clearly by individuals that haven’t visited the exhibition. The poses represent physical actions, and the parts of the body highlighted match this. They truly help you understand what you are seeing. For example, the cadaver pictured has all it’s individual muscles peeled away from the skeleton, posed as if about to kick something – illustrating how the body’s 650 or so muscles work together for motion or to create force.

I was surprised there weren’t more children at the exhibition when Darragh, Jen and myself went. For anyone that has fears that their child might be afraid or disguisted… all children are naturally curious, and they will only have these reactions if you have them too. The messages it teaches are important for everyone, not just to adults, or to the geeks and nerds that would usually frequent museums.

The exhibition describes how inside we are all the same, that we are not invincible and tries to make you understand the complexity and fragility of how we function. Just because it succeeds in doing this by luring you in with the promise of the macabre doesn’t make it any less valid, or any less educational.