The Importance of Bodies
by Sinéad
I’m tired of reading and hearing so many criticisms about the Bodies exhibition from anyone with a loud enough mouth to get heard. No, it’s not art. It is Science wrapped in a publicly accessible package, that in order to survive is required to market itself. Yes, it is entertainment. This is necessary in order to engage with people that have never had an interest in Biology, or any kind of Science before. It succeeds where the Science museums fail because it engages your curiosity, appeals to your intellect and forces you to have emotional reactions.
The use of real bodies is paramount to contextualising what you are seeing. For example, the initial displays, in the first room of the exhibition are just fragments of bone and flesh, parts of bodies in glass display cases. More like a “real” museum than anywhere else. One of the largest of these displays is a pair of legs, with the muscles prominent and labelled – but without the context of the full body the display just ends up looking like meat, like a large ham at Christmas time.
Adding even more context is the fact that they are posed, which is something that has been heavily criticised, clearly by individuals that haven’t visited the exhibition. The poses represent physical actions, and the parts of the body highlighted match this. They truly help you understand what you are seeing. For example, the cadaver pictured has all it’s individual muscles peeled away from the skeleton, posed as if about to kick something – illustrating how the body’s 650 or so muscles work together for motion or to create force.
I was surprised there weren’t more children at the exhibition when Darragh, Jen and myself went. For anyone that has fears that their child might be afraid or disguisted… all children are naturally curious, and they will only have these reactions if you have them too. The messages it teaches are important for everyone, not just to adults, or to the geeks and nerds that would usually frequent museums.
The exhibition describes how inside we are all the same, that we are not invincible and tries to make you understand the complexity and fragility of how we function. Just because it succeeds in doing this by luring you in with the promise of the macabre doesn’t make it any less valid, or any less educational.
Comments
Christmas ham! *shudders*
You’re dead right (hehe), the few kids that were there were completely intrigued.
They really WERE enjoying it. If I had kids I’d bring them… but I’d probably brush up on my human biology so I could answer their many questions.
Me and Sarah are going on Saturday – can’t wait.
woo woo and we’re kiddies so we’ll have LOTS of questions.
Maybe I should come with you and make sure you behave ;)
Oh, by the way there are audioguides that are €4 each, but they just read out to you exactly what is written beside each display.
I wanted to go but couldn’t beat the queues. One of my friends said that going to the exhibition was similar to watching a “Saw” marathon fueling ‘gore lovers’. After reading your post I’m even more curious!
It has a wide appeal.
You should definitely go. It’s really worth it. It has this ability to make you think about the connection we have with our own bodies.
Hey Sinéad,
Many thanks for your blogpost. I presume that I’m like many parents in that I was waiting to see what others thought of viewing the exhibition firsthand before I decided to bring my kids along to it.
It sounded fascinating when I first heard about it and I thought it would be excellent from an educational point of view to bring the children but I am very squeamish being more a physics and chemistry rather than a biology girl so I was concerned I wouldn’t enjoy or appreciate it.
My 9 year old son is very enthusiastic about going so it looks like a visit is definitely on the cards now. Thanks again.
Well said Sinead. I was debating this topic yesterday with a friend, I may just have to send her a link to this post!
@ManicMammy He’s going to love it… though I would heed some caution with regard to one particular section that displays the different stages of the foetus.
@Annie Go ahead! I’d love to hear what she has to say. :)
My art teacher told me about this :P
Well, I bet you’d appreciate it from an artistic perspective too. Most of the displays are incredibly intricate and beautiful.
i imagine that there were so few kids present because of their parents’ ethical concerns. the bodies used were of people with no known next of kin, and were not donated. Muiris Houston had an interesting piece on it in the Irish Times (and for balance, here’s Roy Glover’s reassurance from the same paper).
i was excited about seeing the exhibition but couldn’t justify supporting this business.
Well said there Sinéad. Well said indeed.
@Sinead Definitely. Any serious artist has to look into anatomy at some stage. Not that I’m a serious artist.
@Rosie I too read about these controversial issues before I went, but I don’t think it any different to medical students practising on unclaimed bodies.
@Darragh Thanks, I very much enjoyed your review.
@Thomas Glad to hear it.
Super post. Hear hear.
Stumbled (more should do the same).
Thanks very much Ken :)
I disagree. Got very passionate commenting here, so decided to blog on it here: http://www.clareherbert.ie/archive/172.
Those were people. Not art. Not anatomy lessons. Not models. Not sculptures. They were living, breathing, feeling people. To exploit what they’ve left behind is both immoral and a very poor educational message to send.
I believe that everyone visiting the exhibition is well aware of the once “living, breathing, feeling human” people on display, the exhibition is powerful because of it, both emotively and from an educational perspective. “Artificial exhibitions” would never have the same impact or generate the same healthy curiosity.
It’s a commercial enterprise though, which exploits the dead for profit. I’d imagine that least some visitors look at the bodies as a freak show.
I agree that it must be a powerful exhibition though, and think that the debate which it has generated around education and science is fantastic. But, I will won’t spend my bucks supporting poor human rights.
The joys of a free world I guess, everyone can choose for themselves without censorship. Thought that alternative view needed to be made in an (I hope) non crack-pot sounding way!
You certainly don’t sound like a crack pot :) just a difference of opinion. Enjoyed your post.
Trackbacks